Is the industrial education system still relevant?

he industrial model of education, which originated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, was designed to prepare students for factory jobs by emphasizing uniformity, conformity, and efficiency. This model assumes that all students learn in the same way, at the same pace, and that knowledge can be standardized and delivered en masse. However, in recent years, many people have begun to question the relevance of this model for a number of reasons,

The industrial model of education is characterized by the following features:

1. Standardization: The industrial model of education emphasizes the standardization of curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Students are expected to learn the same things, in the same way, at the same time.
2. Efficiency: The industrial model of education emphasizes efficiency and the use of resources. Schools are expected to produce educated citizens as efficiently as possible, using the least amount of resources.
3. Mass production: The industrial model of education is designed to produce a large number of educated citizens who are all similarly trained and prepared for the workforce.

While the industrial model of education was appropriate for its time, it is increasingly being criticized for its limitations in preparing students for the challenges of the modern world, which requires more creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Many educators are advocating for a more personalized and student-centered approach to education that focuses on developing students' individual strengths and interests, rather than treating them as interchangeable parts in a machine.

Here are some examples of how our education system is based on the industrial model:

1. Age-based grade levels: Our education system is structured around age-based grade levels, where students of the same age are expected to learn the same material at the same pace. This reflects the industrial-era mindset of mass production and standardization.
2. Bell schedules: Most schools operate on a bell schedule, where students move from class to class at fixed intervals, much like assembly line workers in a factory. This reinforces the idea that education is a process of moving students through a system, rather than a personalized journey of learning.
3. Standardized testing: Our education system relies heavily on standardized testing to measure student achievement and evaluate schools and teachers. This reflects the industrial-era emphasis on efficiency and the need to quantify and measure progress in a standardized way.
4. Classroom layout: Most classrooms are designed with rows of desks facing the teacher, which reinforces the idea that learning is a one-way process of information transfer from teacher to student, much like a factory worker receiving instructions from a supervisor.
5. Emphasis on obedience and conformity: Our education system often rewards students who are obedient and conformist, rather than those who challenge the status quo or think outside the box. This reflects the industrial-era mindset of valuing compliance and predictability over creativity and innovation.

These are just a few examples of how our education system reflects the industrial model. While there have been some efforts to reform the system and move towards a more student-centered approach, many of these features remain deeply ingrained in the way we educate our children.

What is the purpose of industrial education? To fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence? Nothing could be further from the truth. The aim is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States and that is its aim everywhere else.

– H. L. Mencken

Parallels between factories and classrooms

There are several parallels between factories and classrooms that are worth exploring. Both are designed to achieve specific outcomes, with a focus on efficiency and productivity. Here are some key similarities:

1. Assembly line approach: Just as factories have assembly lines to produce goods, classrooms often have a one-size-fits-all approach to education, where students are taught the same content in the same way, regardless of their individual needs and abilities.
2. Standardization: Factories strive for standardized products, and classrooms aim for standardized outcomes, with an emphasis on testing and grades. This can lead to a narrow focus on specific subjects and a neglect of more practical skills.
3. Hierarchical structure: Both factories and classrooms have a hierarchical structure, with managers or teachers at the top and workers or students at the bottom. This can create a power dynamic that limits creativity and independent thinking.
4. Time-based system: Both factories and classrooms operate on a time-based system, where time is the controlling factor. In factories, production targets and deadlines are set, while in classrooms, students are given a fixed amount of time to learn a particular subject.
5. Bureaucracy: Both factories and classrooms are subject to bureaucratic processes, rules and regulations that can be restrictive and limit innovation.

While these parallels are not necessarily negative, they do highlight the need for a more modern and relevant approach to education that takes into account the unique needs of individual learners and the changing demands of the modern workforce.

Books that illustrate how our education system is based on the industrial model:

1. "a : In this book, Postman argues that our education system is designed to produce students who are competent workers rather than critical thinkers. He argues that our schools are based on the factory model of efficiency, with an emphasis on standardization and obedience.
2. "Dumbing Us Down" by John Taylor Gatto: In this book, Gatto argues that our education system is designed to produce conformist citizens who are obedient to authority. He suggests that schools are based on the industrial model of mass production, with an emphasis on efficiency and conformity.
3. "The One World Schoolhouse" by Salman Khan: In this book, Khan argues that our education system is outdated and needs to be reimagined for the modern era. He suggests that schools should move away from the factory model of mass production and instead focus on personalized learning, with the help of technology.
4. "The Global Achievement Gap" by Tony Wagner: In this book, Wagner argues that our education system is failing to prepare students for the demands of the 21st century. He suggests that schools need to move away from the industrial model of efficiency and instead focus on teaching skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration.

These books illustrate how our education system is based on the industrial model, and how many educators and scholars are advocating for a shift toward more personalized and student-centered approach.

There are several reasons why the industrial model of education is not considered relevant anymore by many educators and scholars. Here are a few:

1. Lack of focus on critical thinking and creativity: The industrial model of education was designed to produce obedient workers who could follow instructions and perform repetitive tasks. It did not emphasize the development of critical thinking, problem-solving, or creativity. In today's world, where innovation and adaptability are essential, these skills are more important than ever.
2. One-size-fits-all approach: The industrial model of education assumes that all students learn the same way and at the same pace. This is not true, as students have different learning styles, interests, and abilities. A one-size-fits-all approach can lead to students feeling disengaged and unmotivated.
3. Emphasis on memorization over understanding: The industrial model of education emphasizes rote memorization and the regurgitation of facts. This approach does not encourage students to understand concepts deeply or to apply them in real-world situations.
4. Rapidly changing world: The world is changing rapidly, and the skills that are required for success are constantly evolving. The industrial model of education is not flexible enough to keep up with these changes.
5. Technology: Technology has transformed the way we learn and access information. The industrial model of education is not designed to leverage the power of technology to personalize learning and provide students with access to a wide range of resources.

In conclusion, the industrial model of education is no longer considered relevant by many educators and scholars because it does not focus on critical thinking, creativity, individualization, and adapting to the rapidly changing world. As a result, many are advocating for a more personalized, student-centered, and adaptable approach to education.

What kind of schooling is not like an industrial model of education?

Student-centered learning is a form of schooling that is not like the industrial model of education. In student-centered learning, the focus is on the needs and interests of individual students, rather than on the needs of the system. This approach recognizes that each student is unique, and therefore, their learning needs and preferences will differ.

Some characteristics of student-centered learning include:

1. Personalized learning: Students are given the opportunity to work at their own pace and to choose the topics and activities that interest them.
2. Collaborative learning: Students are encouraged to work together and learn from one another.
3. Project-based learning: Students work on long-term projects that require them to apply what they have learned to real-world problems.
4. Inquiry-based learning: Students are encouraged to ask questions, explore, and investigate topics that interest them.
5. Use of technology: Technology is used to personalize learning, provide access to information and resources, and facilitate communication and collaboration.

Overall, student-centered learning is designed to prepare students for the complex and ever-changing world of tomorrow by focusing on the development of critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, and creativity skills.

‍